Subscribe / Unsubscribe Enewsletters | Login | Register

Pencil Banner

Port of San Diego finds value in SAP cloud apps, but not HANA

Derek du Preez | May 16, 2013
Joy Hunter, senior business systems analyst, said that HANA was ‘too big’ for their business.

Port of San Diego finds value in SAP cloud apps, but not HANA

The Unified Port of San Diego (UPSD), a US government agency that manages port activity, has said that it sees significant benefit in adding SAP cloud applications to its core ERP estate, but isn't considering HANA because it is 'too big' for its business.

Computerworld UK spoke to Joy Hunter, senior business systems analyst at UPSD, who is currently managing a project to implement SAP's Cloud for Travel solution, which will integrate with its ERP estate (version 6.6).

Hunter explained that the agency is looking to use as many cloud-based solutions as possible because it makes sense financially and its money should go into making 'money work for the public'. Cloud for Travel will allow UPSD to no longer carry out expenses using paper receipts, but rather using images submitted through mobile-based applications.

Some 525 employees will be using the cloud app once it has been integrated with the ERP suite. Hunter said that once live, Cloud for Travel will mean that the hours put into qualifying expenses for each trip an employee takes will drop from as many as 18 to as little as three.

Prior to choosing SAP's Cloud for Travel, UPSD was actually looking at technology offered by a company called Concur. However, when SAP's cloud solution was released, Hunter decided that the integration process would be much smoother if UPSD stuck with SAP.

"When Cloud for Travel came out, we decided to go down that route because of how expensive the integration would be if we decided to go with a different product," said Hunter.

"Integration is very challenging for any systems that have to talk to each other, but at least the cloud tool and our ERP will be speaking the same language. What I like is that whenever Cloud for Travel gets an update, we get updates on the SAP side too."

She added: "I can't imagine what it would have been like if we had two systems that didn't speak the same language, because the cost of development would have been three times the cost of the product. If we bought the product for $40,000 and I had to do $150,000 development, it doesn't make sense."

Hunter said that although the cloud tool doesn't offer some of the more complex capabilities of an in-house SAP solution, such as with enhanced auditing rules, the ease of the process and the benefits derived from reduced time spent on each expensed trip makes it a good business proposition.

She said there would be definite savings by opting for Cloud for Travel.


1  2  Next Page 

Sign up for Computerworld eNewsletters.