Subscribe / Unsubscribe Enewsletters | Login | Register

Pencil Banner

Schneier: Internet has delivered a 'golden age of surveillance'

Taylor Armerding | April 14, 2014
SOURCE Boston keynote focuses on the good, bad and ugly of mass data collection.

"Information is power," has been true for so long that it has become a cliché.

But the Internet has increased the power to collect, store and analyze information by such an order of magnitude that we are now in what Bruce Schneier called "the golden age of surveillance," in his keynote address Wednesday morning at SOURCE Boston.

That would be golden for those doing the surveillance, not the subjects of it.

Schneier, author, security guru, blogger and CTO of Co3 Systems, said the expectation that the Internet would mainly empower the powerless -- grassroots groups, hackers, minorities and other relatively fringe groups -- did come true for a number of years. But governments around the world have now caught up, he said. And they are better prepared to use power than small, disparate groups.

"Technology magnifies power, but adoption rates are fundamentally different," he said. "The small and powerless are more nimble and quicker to adopt it. But, a decade later when the already powerful institutions discover it, they can make use of power more effectively."

He noted that social networking had helped make the Arab Spring possible, but more recently, in Syria, "the protesters used Facebook to organize, and then government used it to arrest them."

Data, the inevitable byproduct of computers, is nothing new. "But, as more of our human interactions become mediated by computers, that creates a fundamental change," he said. "I had an IM conversation this morning on the way over here, and it produced data -- both the conversation and the metadata about it."

Enabling that fundamental change, he said, is that endless amounts of data are now, "increasingly stored and searchable," which means, "a lot that was thrown away, now can be saved. We're reaching the point where we're saving everything."

An example is his own email. "Starting in '06, searching it became cheaper than sorting it," he said. "And we're now there with all data, which is fundamentally surveillance data."

Reassurances from government officials that they are just collecting metadata, rather than listening to phone conversations or reading emails in real time, are a diversion, he said. "Metadata is far more intimate than our conversations. It shows where we go, our interests, our relationships -- it shows who we are," he said.

And, he added, it allows ubiquitous surveillance. "We'd never consent to the government telling us to carry a device that would let them track us 24/7, but we all carry cellphones," he said. "We'd never agree to government saying we have to tell them when we make a new friend, but we tell Facebook."

Schneier said he does not have a Google or Facebook account, but knows there is enough information about him online that, "if I sign up for Facebook, they will provide a reasonably accurate list of my friends."

 

1  2  Next Page 

Sign up for Computerworld eNewsletters.